Showing posts with label Breaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Breaks. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

5 Tax Breaks Corporations Get That You Don"t








 


Corporations are quick to claim “corporate personhood” and their First Amendment rights when it comes to their ability to donate to political candidates, influence elections, and lobby or when it comes to advertising their products, especially those deemed dangerous or socially destructive. But on tax day, corporations are quite content with a tax code full of perks and privileges for corporations that are not available to living, breathing human beings.


  1. When corporations break the law, they get a tax break

If you forget to feed the meter, or go a little too fast and get a speed camera traffic ticket in the mail, or God forbid fail to pick up after your dog in a public park, when it comes to tax time, forget it – none of these fines for bad behavior are tax deductible.


But that’s not the case for corporate bad actors.  Take, for example, BP’s toxic mess in the Gulf of Mexico or Wells Fargo’s abusive lending practices that cost tens of thousands American families their homes. BP’s clean-up costs and Wells Fargo’s settlement fees were likely fully deductible, leaving the rest of us to pick up a significant piece of the tab for their destructive behavior. Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) have issued a bi-partisan call to end the tax deduction for Wall Street banks settling charges of lending abuse that lead to the Great Recession.


  1. When corporations fall on hard times, the tax code helps makes them whole

When corporations fall on hard times and lose money in a given year, those losses cannot only be used to fully offset any taxes they owe that year, but they are allowed to carry those losses into the future for up to seven years, reducing their taxes when good times return.


Families face a different set of rules on tax day. Imagine the family that has experienced long-term unemployment or costs of an uninsured major illness during the year. They might have to deplete their savings or retirement accounts to stay afloat. Like the corporation, they are able to deduct the cost of their losses in the year they occur, but unlike corporations they cannot generally carry the deductions they cannot use into future years.


Corporations can use future tax savings to recoup their losses and replenish the savings drained during the bad year. Human families get no such benefit. 


  1. Many corporations get to choose where in the world to report their income, allowing them to choose a nation with low or no taxes

For American workers, there is little doubt where their income is earned and thus where the taxes are owed. If you are a doctor with an office in Omaha, you can’t pack up your diploma and ship it to a bank vault in the Cayman Islands and tell your patients to mail their payment check to a post office box in the Caribbean nation, explaining that they need to pay for the intellectual property represented by that diploma.


But if you are a corporation, that’s exactly what you can do. U.S corporations have $ 1.7 trillion of their profits stashed offshore, much of it in places like the Cayman Islands, even though most have no employees or offices in tax haven nations. They do so because they register their patents in a tax haven nation, like the Cayman Islands, that imposes no taxes on corporate income. They argue that the shift in profits from the U.S. to the tax haven is to pay the cost of the intellectual property represented by the patent. This sort of profit shifting and tax haven abuse by corporations costs the U.S Treasury $ 90 billion a year in lost tax revenue.


  1. Superstorm Sandy devastated millions of American families, but corporations got to deduct the full value of their losses from their taxes

Millions of American families suffered damage to their homes and property last year, from Superstorm Sandy, western fires and other natural disasters. The federal tax code expects human property owners to pick up the full cost of damage for an amount equal to ten percent of the taxpayer’s annual reported income. Beyond the ten percent threshold, any additional losses may be taken as a tax deduction.


In contrast, corporations face no such income threshold. Corporate shareholders are not asked to absorb damages equal to ten percent of the corporation’s taxable income as individual families are. Corporations can –and do – deduct every dollar of losses they incur. Many firms, including Verizon and other utilities serving the New York and New Jersey areas saved millions of dollars on their 2012 taxes by deducting the full costs of Sandy damage on their taxes.


  1. If you are an American citizen working abroad you pay American taxes on your foreign earnings; if you are an American corporation you can indefinitely delay paying U.S. taxes on income you earn abroad.

About five million American citizens live or work abroad. Come April 15th, each of them is expected to file a tax return and pay U.S. taxes on all their income. The amount they owe is reduced by an amount equal to any taxes they paid to foreign governments on that income.


But U.S. corporations get a different deal, called deferral. They get to indefinitely put off paying U.S. taxes of their foreign until and unless they bring those funds back to America. This loophole costs the U.S. Treasury almost $ 60 billion a year. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) recently introduced the Corporate Tax Dodging Prevention Act, which would close this loophole, putting corporations and real humans on the same footing come tax time.


As many people work hard to make corporations less human on election day, perhaps it is time to make them more human on tax day.


Scott Klinger is an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.


 


Wed, 04/10/2013 – 13:06


 
AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



5 Tax Breaks Corporations Get That You Don"t

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Aaron Dykes Breaks Down "Whole Foods" GMO Deception


Aaron Dykes Breaks Down

Undercover video investigating admitted presence of GMOs at Whole Foods stores is pulled from You Tube. A controversial video of an undercover investigation into the presence of GMO foods at the “organic” grocery leader Whole Foods Market has been pulled from You Tube just days after its release sparked a reaction throughout the health conscious blogosphere and alternative media. A ‘sting’ video released by Organic Spies featuring covert footage alleges that Whole Foods was deceiving its customers by touting organic foods and a corporate ideal set against GMOs while simultaneously selling a large portion of products that contain widely prevalent GMO ingredients. On-camera statements of numerous Whole Foods employees in the Los Angeles area underscore the fact that its employees are ignorant of the presence of GMO foods on store shelves, leaving the average customer even more so in the dark. Now that original video– linked here– which was posted 6 days ago and which had well over 100000 views, was removed from You Tube, due to alleged violations of its Terms of Service. Typically, this indicates a 3rd party complaint, though You Tube no longer automatically informs users of the identities of parties who make claims against videos, so the role of Whole Foods here is not clear. www.infowars.com www.infowars.com www.prisonplanet.tv twitter.com www.facebook.com [Join The Alex Jones Team and Start Getting Healthy Today!] www.infowarsteam.com [New Website] www.infowarshealth


Aaron Dykes Breaks Down "Whole Foods" GMO Deception

Friday, February 15, 2013

Wealthy French Eye Belgian Tax Breaks (Everyone in France Should Do the Same)

The inheritance tax in France is 45%, in Belgium it’s 3%. France has a wealth tax, Belgium doesn’t.

Wealthy French have known and used these loopholes for quite some time, but appeal of such schemes is on the rise following massive tax hikes of president Francois Hollande.

Please consider Wealthy French eye Belgian tax perks.

For decades, Thierry Afschrift’s boutique tax law practice was among the best-kept secrets of Belgium’s wealthy elite, his name passed discreetly between the landed gentry and industrialists in Brussels’ leafy suburbs seeking shelter from the kingdom’s Byzantine tax laws.

But in the past five months, Mr Afschrift’s phones have been ringing off the hook from another clientele altogether – wealthy Frenchmen seeking to set up private foundations in Belgium to protect their family fortunes from onerous taxes imposed by President François Hollande.

“We have loads of people coming every day asking us questions about setting up foundations,” Mr Afschrift said from his office on Brussels’ upmarket Avenue Louise. Other Belgian tax lawyers say they have been receiving around 10 calls a day from France inquiring about private family foundations.

The key to Belgian foundation law is that it permits the patron to hand over all assets to children as a gift, taxed at only 3 per cent instead of France’s 45 per cent inheritance tax. It also avoids France’s annual wealth tax, a levy that does not exist in Belgium. To top it off, the foundation’s benefactor retains full control of the assets while alive and can set disbursement terms for after their death.

“It is a very good tool to transfer assets gradually and assure the children don’t squander that family’s accumulated wealth,” says Manoël Dekeyser, one of Belgium’s most prominent tax attorneys.

“If the children want the money to play at the casino, the foundation’s manager can block them from doing so, if he has been instructed to do so by the parents.”

Said one lawyer, who asked not to be named to protect his firm: “Unfortunately, Arnault brought greater attention to the foundations system than we would have hoped.

“I would have preferred to keep it very discreet. Rich people know how to find us. They don’t need to read it in the Financial Times.”

Arnault Effect

Bernard Arnault is the owner of fashion and champagne house LVMH and reputedly Europe’s richest man.

French actor Gérard Depardieu stirred up tax debate with a threat to seek Belgian citizenship to avoid Hollande’s new top tax rate of 75% on millionaires.

Depardieu, who has been in around 200 films, says he’s moving to Belgium to avoid paying a new 75 percent tax on the superwealthy. The move has divided the country and has focused attention on the Socialist government’s controversial new tax policy.

The uproar began just before Christmas, when it came to light that Depardieu bought a home in Nechin, a drab Belgian village less than a mile over the French border. Depardieu admitted to establishing a foreign residence to escape new French tax rates.

“It’s pathetic really,” Prime Minister Jean Marc Ayrault said earlier this month. “Paying taxes is an act of patriotism and we’re asking the rich to make a special effort here for the country.”

Depardieu shot back at Ayrault in an open letter published in a major Sunday newspaper, Le Journal du Dimanche.

“I am leaving because you consider success, creativity and talent grounds for sanction,” the actor wrote. Depardieu said he has paid more than $ 190 million in taxes over the last four decades. He said he no longer recognized his country and offered to surrender his passport if he was, indeed, so pathetic.

Hollande’s Tax Hikes Backfire

Based on the Financial Times article as well as actual moves by the super-wealthy, it appears Hollande’s tax policies have already backfired.

For every dime collected, a flood of middle-class and wealthy French are setting up foundations to avoid inheritance taxes and shelter current income as well.

Indeed, any French citizen with an estate to pass on should investigate setting up a private foundation in Belgium to avoid onerous inheritance taxes.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis


Wealthy French Eye Belgian Tax Breaks (Everyone in France Should Do the Same)