Showing posts with label Percentage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Percentage. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

German Reader Tackles Question "What Percentage of the Vote will Anti-Euro Party AfD Receive in Upcoming Election?"

Polls show the support for the anti-euro Alternatives for Germany AfD party as high as 17% according to the Financial Times.


However that 17% is the number of voters who would “consider” voting for an anti-euro party, not the number of people committed to that outcome.


Specifically, the FT article states “AfD is a late entrant for the election on September 22 and might not be radical enough to attract protest voters it needs in order to make it over the five per cent vote threshold for seats in the Bundestag.


The AfD, led by economics professor Bernd Lucke, is dominated by former CDU members who became disillusioned with the chancellor’s European policy that is broadly supported by a majority of the public.


Underestimating the Vote


In contrast to the possibility AfD receives less than 5% of the vote as mentioned by the Financial Times, reader Bern who lives in Germany believes AfD is going to receive substantially more than 10% of the vote.


Bern writes ….

Hello Mish,

I just returned from the foundation congregation of AfD party in Berlin.


About 1500 party members from all parts of Germany came to Berlin to form the federal part of the party as per legal requirement in order to participate in the coming federal elections. The party is now legally formed, it has a legal party statute and an election program.


This means that about 50% of all legal requirements are now met. We have another 100 days to meet the other 50% (establish a State arm of the party in each federal State (16) and to collect 2000 signatures in each State). We do not expect any problems arising from these two obstacles.


It can now safely be assumed that AfD is “open for business” for the coming federal elections.


This party is something entirely new in Germany. It does no longer follow traditional “dividing lines” between left and right or conservative and liberal. Our members are clearly from the heart of the “bourgeois” society of Germany. Small entrepreneurs, self-employed people, teachers and professors, doctors and lawyers, skilled workers, craftsmen,…. in short, a wide variety of the so called “better educated” part of society, who naturally have a rather diverse ideological background.


The common theme uniting this varied crowd is the desire to get rid of the shackles of the Euro and to return to democratic values, both in Europe as well as in Germany.


With about 10,000 members and growing rapidly, I would be surprised if the party received less than 10% of the votes in the coming German federal elections. I am prepared to stick my neck out and predict a figure substantially higher.


AfD will have a considerable influence on German politics in the coming months. It is now no longer possible for the other parties to ignore this new movement.


CDU, SPD, FDP and the Green Party can no longer avoid the Euro as the dominant and overriding theme of the coming German elections.


Chancellor Merkel had wanted to do a “sleeping pill” campaign on such peculiar subjects as “fairness”, “family values” and the like. SPD and Green Party were happy to follow. FDP added some “lowering taxes” issues to the mix.


As of today, Merkel can kiss that objective goodbye.


The Euro and democracy will be the overriding themes of the coming elections. This will catapult AfD into the minds of the people here.


As the Euro comes under attack from all sides. I wonder if an orderly dissolution is still possible or if the result is a disorderly collapse. I still believe the latter is more likely.


Best wishes
Bernd


Given that the nannycrats have underestimated the backlash of every policy decision and every important vote, especially in Italy, I am a firm believer that reader Bern is correct.


In a followup post, we will discuss what this means for chancellor Merkel. Here’s a hint. If you are a Merkel supporter, the result won’t be pretty.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis



German Reader Tackles Question "What Percentage of the Vote will Anti-Euro Party AfD Receive in Upcoming Election?"

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Only a Tiny Percentage of Americans Opposed to Breaking Up Big Banks


A new Huffington Post/YouGov poll finds:








Sixty-one percent of respondents said that banks and other financial institutions have become too large and powerful ….



A Rasmussen poll conducted last month found that:








A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 50% of U.S. Adults favor a plan to break up the 12 megabanks, which currently control about 69% of the banking industry. Twenty-three percent (23%) oppose breaking up the largest banks, while another 27% are undecided.



While polls show that Democrats favor breaking up the big banks more than Republicans, many Republicans point out that the big banks would fail on their own if the government stopped bailing them out. Indeed, a Harris poll from last year shows that 87% of Republicans are against bank bailouts. In other words, the percentage of Americans who favor breaking up the big banks – either directly through government intervention or indirectly by pulling the plug on their taxpayer life support – is probably more like 90-99%.


The 27% of Americans who don"t yet have enough information to decide whether they are for directly breaking up the big banks may want to note that the following top economists and financial experts believe that the economy cannot recover unless the big, insolvent banks are broken up in an orderly fashion:


  • Current Vice Chair and director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation – and former 20-year President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City – Thomas Hoenig (and see this)

  • Former Federal Reserve Bank of New York economist and Salomon Brothers vice chairman, Henry Kaufman

  • Dean and professor of finance and economics at Columbia Business School, and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush, R. Glenn Hubbard

  • The leading monetary economist and co-author with Milton Friedman of the leading treatise on the Great Depression, Anna Schwartz

  • Economics professor and senior regulator during the S & L crisis, William K. Black

  • Professor of entrepreneurship and finance at the Chicago Booth School of Business, Luigi Zingales

  • The Director of Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Harvey Rosenblum

  • Director, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, and Professor of Economics, University of Bonn, Martin Hellwig

And the head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank – and former Goldman Sachs chief economist – William Dudley says that we should not tolerate a financial system in which certain financial institutions are deemed to be too big to fail.


Federal Reserve Board governor Daniel Tarullo also backs a cap on the size of banks, and Former Treasury secretary under Reagan and George H.W. Bush, Nicolas Brady, says that we need to put a cap on leverage.


The undecideds may also want to note that many top bankers are themselves calling for a break up, including:


  • Former managing director of Goldman Sachs – and head of the international analytics group at Bear Stearns in London- Nomi Prins

  • Numerous other bankers within the mega-banks (see this, for example)

  • Founder and chairman of Signature Bank, Scott Shay

  • Former Natwest and Schroders investment banker, Philip Augar

  • The President of the Independent Community Bankers of America, Camden Fine

Click here for background on why so many top bankers, economists, financial experts and politicians say that the big banks should be broken up.







Zero Hedge



Only a Tiny Percentage of Americans Opposed to Breaking Up Big Banks