Showing posts with label House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Suspected Saudi Terrorist Al-Harbi Visited White House Numerous Times

Visited by First Lady Michelle Obama while in hospital


Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali al-Harbi, who was briefly held as a “person of interest” in the Boston bombings and then downgraded in less than 24 hours to a witness, visited the White House on numerous occasions since 2009, The Rightscoop reports today.




The startling allegation follows an earlier report indicating that al-Harbi was visited in the hospital by First Lady Michelle Obama after he allegedly sustained injuries from one of the explosives placed at the Boston Marathon.


Blogosphere sleuths subsequently put their hands on a photo definitively placing Obama at the hospital.


Saudi On Terror Watch List


The Department of Homeland Security confessed today that al-Harbi was on a terror watch list, although DHS boss Napolitano attempted to minimize this revelation by stating that he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.


“Because he was being interviewed, [after the he was at that point put on a watchlist, and then when it was quickly determined he had nothing to do with the bombing, the watch listing status was removed,” she told Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa during a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee.


“Napolitano seems to either flatly contradict herself or openly admit that it is easy for someone to be put on a terrorist watchlist even though they don’t reach ‘person of interest’ status,” Walid Shoebatwrites on his blog today. “That’s either a lie or a chilling statement of what this government is doing.”


A couple obvious questions come to mind. First, why did the First Lady visit a man who was on a terror watch list, no matter how briefly, and second, how is it that he gained access to what is supposedly one of the most secure buildings in the United States?


Is it possible we can attribute the hospital visit and multiple visits to the White House to a special relationship shared between Saudi royals and at least two presidents? For instance, is well-known that George W. Bush had a close relationship with the corrupt Saudi monarchy.


Delivered by The Daily Sheeple



Contributed by Kurt Nimmo of Infowars.com.


The Daily Sheeple



Suspected Saudi Terrorist Al-Harbi Visited White House Numerous Times

Friday, April 19, 2013

US House of Representatives passes CISPA cybersecurity bill

Unknown


 


The US House of Representatives has passed the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protect Act (CISPA).


Lawmakers in the House voted 288-to-127 Thursday afternoon to pass the bill. Next it will move to the Senate and could then end up on the desk of US President Barack Obama for him to potentially sign the bill into law. Earlier this week, though, senior White House advisers said they would recommend the president veto the bill.


Note: be sure to read our article outlining the problems that remain in CISPA even after the amendments, including the fact that data will still be sent to the National Security Agency


Should CISPA earn the president’s autograph, private businesses will be encouraged to voluntarily share cyberthreat information with the US government. The authors of the bill say this is an effort to better combat the reportedly increasing attempts to harm America’s criticalcomputer networks and pilfer the systems of private companies for intellectual property and other sensitive trade secrets.


One of the bill’s creators, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Maryland), said during a round of debate on Wednesday that $ 400 billion worth of American trade secrets are being stolen by US companies every year. Passing CISPA, he said, would be a common sense solution to a threat that’s growing at an alarming rate.


“If your house is being robbed, you call 911 and the police department comes. That’s the same scenario we are looking at here,” he said.



Also testifying Wednesday, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Florida) said CISPA could be used to combat the 25 million cybercrime victims she claims are targeted every day.


That same day, CISPA co-author Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Michigan) stressed that his bill doesn’t extend any extra surveillance powers to the federal government, despite condemnation from critics that say exactly that. “It does something very simple: it allows the government to share zeroes and ones with the private sector,” he said. Rather, he called it “a critical bipartisan first step for enabling American’s private sector to defend itself” and “improves cybersecurity without compromising our civil liberties.”


“We have yet to find a single United States company that opposes this bill,” said Rep. Rogers.



But companies do in fact oppose CISPA, including a number of entities that carry a good deal of clout around both Silicon Valley and inside the beltway. Just last month Facebook rescinded their support of the act, according to Cnet’s Declan McCullagh, because a spokesperson for thesocial media site says they prefer a legislative “balance” that ensures “the privacy of our users.”


After CISPA was unsuccessfully introduced to Congress last year — only to stall in the Senate — Microsoft endorsed the act only to eventually do an about-face.


“Microsoft believes that any proposed legislation should facilitate the voluntary sharing of cyber threat information in a manner that allows us to honor the privacy and security promises we make to our customers,” the company’s Scott Charney told McCullagh at the time.



But just last week, TechNet President Rey Ramsey sent a letter to Reps. Rogers and Ruppersberger saying his group thinks CISPA “recognizes the need for effective cybersecurity legislation that encourages voluntary, bi-directional, real time sharing of actionable cyberthreat information to protect networks,” but that further work may be needed. TechNet’s Executive Council includes Yahoo’s Marissa Mayer, Google’s Eric Schmidt and Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith.


Web browser makers Mozilla oppose the bill, as does the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union, and last year’s attempt to pass CISPA after it was unveiled for a first time prompted the White House to issue a veto warning then. In the months since the bill stalled in the Senate, though, the president has on his own part urged Congress to adopt a new cybersecurity bill.


CISPA 101: Originally introduced in late-2011, CISPA passed the House but never advanced to a full Senate vote after massive public campaigns waged against the bill. It’s authors say CISPA will “provide for the sharing of certain cyber threat intelligence and cyber threat information between the intelligence community and cybersecurity entities” by encouraging private companies such as Google, Facebook and others to hand over to the government any data that could be used to combat cyberattacks. Critics of the bill say its language is too broad, though, and allows federal agencies to access too much personal information.


In February, Pres. Obama signed an executive order that urges his administration to begin working towards improving cybersecurity protections until Congress can craft a bill. Hours later, he said during his annual State of the Union address how imperative legislation action is.


“Earlier today, I signed a new executive order that will strengthen our cyber defenses by increasing information sharing, and developing standards to protect our national security, our jobs and our privacy. Now, Congress must act as well, by passing legislation to give our government a greater capacity to secure our networks and deter attacks,” the president said.



But in the veto threat extended by his office earlier this week, the White House writes, “the Administration still seeks additional improvements and if the bill, as currently crafted, were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.”


Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) corroborated on that statement during Thursday’s pre-vote discussion, vowing to cast her ballot against CISPA because it did not, in her opinion, protect the privacy of Americans to the degree it should.


“I’m disappointed,” said the congresswoman, “that we did not address some of the concerns mentioned by the White House about personal information. Unfortunately, it offers no policies and did not allow any amendments or real solution that upholds Americans’ right to privacy.”


CISPA, added Pelosi, provides “overly broad liability protections and immunity to the businesses that violate our liberties,” and fails to strike a “crucial balance between security and liberty.”


But elsewhere during Thursday’s debate, another elected lawmaker cited national security concerns as paramount to these privacy woes. Speaking before his congressional colleagues, Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas) said this week’s deadly terrorist attack in Boston are reason enough to pass a cybersecurity bill, despite lacing evidence that the pair of bombs detonated Monday at the Boston Marathon were acts of cyberterror.


“Recent events in Boston demonstrate that we have to come together as Republicans and Democrats” in order to pass a bill that will strengthen national security, McCaul (R-Texas) said Thursday morning.


“In the case of Boston,” said McCaul, “there were real bombs.”


“In this case, they are digital bombs — and these digital bombs are on their way.”


Another lawmaker, Rep. Dan Maffei (D-New York), said CISPA was necessary to protect the US against “independent groups like WikiLeaks,” adding unfounded claims that the whistleblower website is “taking very aggressive measures to hack into” US computer networks.


Other noteworthy statements that came out of this week’s CISPA debate include one quip from Rep. Candice Miller (R-Michigan), who said Wednesday that the bill “helps us fulfill every one of the responsibilities mandated on us by the US Constitution.”


“I believe strongly that you should have constitutional concerns about not passing this bill,”said Rep. Miller.“By supporting CISPA, we move to fulfill our oath” to protect the American people, added Rep. William Enyart (D-Illinois).



As news broke Thursday afternoon that CISPA cleared the House, opponents took to social media to sound out. The EFF responded by saying the House


“shamefully” passed,“undermining the privacy of millions of Internet users.”



When Rep. Ruppersberger reintroduced CISPA at the start of this congressional season, he evoked the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 to suggest that Congress can and will do whatever is necessary in the wake of another tragedy.


“We don’t do anything well after a significant emotional event,” said Ruppersberger. Should there be a cyberattack on America on par with 9/11, Congress “will get all the bills passed we want,” he said.


 


Delivered by The Daily Sheeple



Contributed by Madison Ruppert of End the Lie.


Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis database End The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on UCY.TV from 7 pm — 10 pm Pacific, which you can find HERE.  If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com


Twitter: http://twitter.com/endtheliedotcom
Facebook: http://facebook.com/endthelie
Youtube: http://youtube.com/endthelie


The Daily Sheeple



US House of Representatives passes CISPA cybersecurity bill

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Elvis Impersonator Arrested for Sending Ricin to White House Claims “Secret War” With Government





The man who was recently arrested for sending ricin to the White House is an Elvis impersonator who found a refrigerator full of human organs in 2001, which he claims is part of a government conspiracy involving the mafia.  According to his online posts, this theory has made him a target for government harassment ever since.


Photo: Wikipedia Commons

Photo: Wikipedia Commons



by Rob Hale
Intellihub.com
April 18, 2013


We are all, undoubtedly, familiar with the recent attack on president Obama, Sen. Roger Wicker and a here unnamed Mississippi justice official that has occurred in the past week. This attack came in the form of letters addressed to the aforementioned political figures, containing a highly toxic substance called ricin.


This is a very serious matter, despite the fact that the letters didn’t even contain a proper lethal dose of the deadly substance! As many are now becoming aware of, the letters had been sent by Paul Kevin Curtis, a man of little renown outside of local Elvis impersonator circles (his job of choice).


He also spent time as a Kid Rock and Buddy Holly impersonator, though he would rather describe himself as a “super entertainer” or even better “Master of Impressions.” (Kinda reminiscent of that comedy, Master of Disguise…. Turtle turtle…) But to really delve into the subject and understand what brought a man who seemed SO on top of things to commit such a heinous act, one may have to dive down the rabbit hole to the year 2001.


It was the year 2001, when his “secret war” with U.S. officials and FBI began. It was in the act of cleaning up that he “accidentally discovered a refrigerator full of dismembered body parts & organs wrapped in plastic in the morgue.” He immediately did as any of us would have, and reported it to the police, which he now likely considers his “first mistake.”


He believes that the organs, were part of a major conspiracy between the government, and the infamous La cosa Nostra (mafia) involving the black market sale of organs. It was after this that he believes he was made to be a “person of interest, where my every move was watched and videotaped.” Interesting story right? Sadly, we haven’t even scratched the surface.



In 2007 Curtis appeared on Ripoff-Report, a forum which is used by the disgruntled to expose supposed scams making the statement


“3 Years of research lead to countless court battles, cops harassing me weekly, death threats, personal & financial losses, several thefts, my home burned down, car exploded, marriage dissolved & bankruptcy.” He reported going to elected officials for help, writing letter after letter, a majority of which contained the line “I am KC and I approve this message” in the signature, I know, this cant get any better but it does!


A recent affidavit released by the Department of Justice quotes his toxic letters as saying “Maybe I have your attention now even if that means someone must die.” Senator Wicker has even commented that he’s met with Curtis at banquets and events that Curtis had performed at, saying that he feared for the mans sanity and remarking that he usually made an uneasy departure shortly after being approached by him.


Curtis wrote on his facebook that he is “on the hidden front lines of a secret war” just hours before being arrested in his home by the feds.


“My mother wants me to SHUT UP. My brothers fear me. My sister hates me. … I have lost most of my friends,” he wrote. “I have spent more than $ 130,000 on legal fees in 13.5 years. … They destroyed my marriage, they distracted my career, they stalked, they trolled, they came into my home, took my computers, had me arrested 22 times and guess what? I am still a thorn in the corrupt anals! I will remain here until Jesus Christ decides its time for me to go.”


Whatever the situation is, it is rather apparent that something… or rather someone in this situation is absolutely crazy, but it does lead one to wonder, what kind of person would willingly take these consequences upon themselves for the perpetuation of a sham?


 


Sources:


^http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/197326/paul-kevin-curtis-would-be-ricin-assassin-was-an-elvis-impersonator-batshit-crazy-person/


^http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/18/ricin-suspect-long-known-for-angry-screeds/


*****


Rob Hale writes is an investigative journalist writing for Intellihub.com, a popular independent news website.





Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin WordPress | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

Intellihub.com

Elvis Impersonator Arrested for Sending Ricin to White House Claims “Secret War” With Government

Friday, April 12, 2013

Top House Dem: On Social Security Cuts, Obama Is Like a Small Child



President Barack Obama’s new budget has much of his own base up in arms, particularly over $ 230 billion in proposed cuts to Social Security. On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) convened a meeting of House Democrats to hear a closed-door debate on the proposal, which would cost retirees hundreds of dollars a year by tying the growth of monthly Social Security benefits to a new, lower measure of inflation called chained CPI. It was unclear whether the meeting changed any minds, but it certainly highlighted the divisions between the president and his party.


Speaking to reporters after the debate, many Democrats complained that Obama put the cuts on the table far too early. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House rules committee, likened Obama’s negotiating skills to the eagerness of a five-year-old. “When I was a kid, I couldn’t play hide and seek,” she said. “The pressure was just too much on me. I would hop up and say, Here I am! This is the way this negotiation is taking place. We’re trying to get a grand plan out of Republicans. It would be better instead of hollering up, Here I am! to get that agreement first, before you put it in your budget.”


Rep. Nydia Velasquez (D-N.Y.) said she could envision putting chained CPI in the budget, but only as a product of negotiations, not as an initial offer, and only as part of a grand bargain with additional revenues, and investments in other progressive priorities. “We don’t know what the other side is willing to offer,” she said. “We cannot give anything on a silver platter.”


Other Democrats were outright opposed to the president’s plan. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) looked positively distraught. “I can only say that the Progressive Caucus is dead set against it,” he said. Rep. Jan Schakowski (D-Ill.) said she had no idea why Obama is embracing what was initially a Republican idea. “Chained CPI was a bad idea when [GOP Speaker of the House John] Boehner had it, and it’s a bad idea now,” she said, adding that measure would hurt seniors much more than the recent tax hikes on high-earners hurt them. Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research has calculated that switching to chained CPI would cut about 2 percent of seniors’ retirement income over 20 years. By contrast, the hit that the rich got from Obama’s New Year’s tax increases was only 0.6 percent.


Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) said she hopes her party doesn’t cave and line up behind the president. “This is so serious because…it will last forever,” she said. “If we institutionalize the chained CPI, we will literally throw generations into poverty.”


The debate House Democrats attended pitted Damon Silvers, the associate general counsel of the AFL-CIO, against Robert Greenstein, executive director of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Silvers adamantly opposes chained CPI. Greenstein argues that the plan could be workable, but only if included in a bipartisan deal that preserves spending on things like antipoverty programs and infrastructure, and contains protections for the oldest and poorest beneficiaries, as the president’s budget does.


Pelosi suggested that many in her caucus thought chained CPI should be preserved as an option for making Social Security solvent in the long run, not as a way to pay down the national debt. “The deficit is not about Social Security,” said Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J). “What puzzles me is why the president would do this.”


But nearly every House Democrat who spoke to reporters after the event suggested that, other criticisms aside, Obama’s chained CPI proposal is bad politics. “Our brand is the party that brought you Social Security,” Holt said. Slaughter added that she has been swamped with calls by unhappy constituents opposing the president’s idea. “I’m at a loss for words,” she said. “There are so many people living hand to mouth, day to day.”



Politics | Mother Jones



Top House Dem: On Social Security Cuts, Obama Is Like a Small Child

Top House Dem: On Social Security Cuts, Obama Is Like a Small Child



President Barack Obama’s new budget has much of his own base up in arms, particularly over $ 230 billion in proposed cuts to Social Security. On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) convened a meeting of House Democrats to hear a closed-door debate on the proposal, which would cost retirees hundreds of dollars a year by tying the growth of monthly Social Security benefits to a new, lower measure of inflation called chained CPI. It was unclear whether the meeting changed any minds, but it certainly highlighted the divisions between the president and his party.


Speaking to reporters after the debate, many Democrats complained that Obama put the cuts on the table far too early. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House rules committee, likened Obama’s negotiating skills to the eagerness of a five-year-old. “When I was a kid, I couldn’t play hide and seek,” she said. “The pressure was just too much on me. I would hop up and say, Here I am! This is the way this negotiation is taking place. We’re trying to get a grand plan out of Republicans. It would be better instead of hollering up, Here I am! to get that agreement first, before you put it in your budget.”


Rep. Nydia Velasquez (D-N.Y.) said she could envision putting chained CPI in the budget, but only as a product of negotiations, not as an initial offer, and only as part of a grand bargain with additional revenues, and investments in other progressive priorities. “We don’t know what the other side is willing to offer,” she said. “We cannot give anything on a silver platter.”


Other Democrats were outright opposed to the president’s plan. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) looked positively distraught. “I can only say that the Progressive Caucus is dead set against it,” he said. Rep. Jan Schakowski (D-Ill.) said she had no idea why Obama is embracing what was initially a Republican idea. “Chained CPI was a bad idea when [GOP Speaker of the House John] Boehner had it, and it’s a bad idea now,” she said, adding that measure would hurt seniors much more than the recent tax hikes on high-earners hurt them. Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research has calculated that switching to chained CPI would cut about 2 percent of seniors’ retirement income over 20 years. By contrast, the hit that the rich got from Obama’s New Year’s tax increases was only 0.6 percent.


Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) said she hopes her party doesn’t cave and line up behind the president. “This is so serious because…it will last forever,” she said. “If we institutionalize the chained CPI, we will literally throw generations into poverty.”


The debate House Democrats attended pitted Damon Silvers, the associate general counsel of the AFL-CIO, against Robert Greenstein, executive director of the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Silvers adamantly opposes chained CPI. Greenstein argues that the plan could be workable, but only if included in a bipartisan deal that preserves spending on things like antipoverty programs and infrastructure, and contains protections for the oldest and poorest beneficiaries, as the president’s budget does.


Pelosi suggested that many in her caucus thought chained CPI should be preserved as an option for making Social Security solvent in the long run, not as a way to pay down the national debt. “The deficit is not about Social Security,” said Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J). “What puzzles me is why the president would do this.”


But nearly every House Democrat who spoke to reporters after the event suggested that, other criticisms aside, Obama’s chained CPI proposal is bad politics. “Our brand is the party that brought you Social Security,” Holt said. Slaughter added that she has been swamped with calls by unhappy constituents opposing the president’s idea. “I’m at a loss for words,” she said. “There are so many people living hand to mouth, day to day.”



Politics | Mother Jones



Top House Dem: On Social Security Cuts, Obama Is Like a Small Child

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Vermont Police to Protest Marijuana Decriminalization at State House






Police from across Vermont plan to descend on the State House today to protest ongoing hearings on pending legislation that would decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana, legislation that is supported by the state’s Attorney General, the Governor and many state lawmakers.


drug-dog-marijuana (Copy)By Thomas H. Clarke
The Daily Chronic
April 11, 2013


The Vermont Police Association, which represents the interests of all levels in law enforcement, the Vermont Police Chiefs Association and the Vermont State Sheriffs Association oppose the two marijuana decriminalization bills currently working their way through the legislature.


The Vermont Troopers’ Association, a labor union representing officers of the Vermont State Police, has taken no position regarding marijuana decriminalization, President Sgt. Mike O’Neil said.


Vergennes Police Chief George Merkel says law-enforcement officers from municipal, county and possibly some state departments are planning to be at the state house from about 8 a.m. to 1 pm. Thursday to confer with legislators and others about what they say are reasons to reject the idea.


As written, House Bill 200, introduced by Rep. Christopher Pearson (P-Burlington) with a tripartisan group of 38 co-sponsors, would remove criminal penalties for possession of up to two ounces of marijuana and replace them with a civil fine of up to $ 100, similar to a traffic ticket.  The bill is likely to be amended by the House Judiciary Committee, who recommended dropping the amount that would bring only a civil fine from two ounces to one, bringing the proposal in line with a companion bill working its way through the Senate.


Senate Bill 48, introduced by Sen. Joe Benning (R-Caledonia) with a tripartisan group of eight co-sponsors, would remove criminal penalties for possession of up to one ounce of marijuana and replace them with a civil fine of up to $ 100.


At public hearings on the bills last week, the strongest proponent to decriminalization came from an unlikely source: the state’s Attorney General Bill Sorrell, who testified in favor of both bills.



“I’m here in support of decriminalization,” Sorrell told a House committee last Wednesday. “This might be a surprise to some but the reality is possession of small amounts of marijuana has in effect been decriminalized for quite some time in this state.”


At the hearing, Attorney General Sorrel caught some lawmakers — and marijuana advocates — off guard when he added that lawmakers should consider allowing Vermonters to grow “one or two” marijuana plants without fear of prosecution.


“If you take away the ability to grow your own, you’re pushing someone who wants to possess and use marijuana into the marketplace of having to deal with marijuana dealers,” Sorrell said. “And is that the behavior you essentially want to require and foster?”


Public Safety Commissioner Keith Flynn and Chittenden County State’s Attorney T.J. Donovan also testified in favor of the bill, joining marijuana advocates and public defenders voicing their support.


“This bill will bring consistency and fairness to the four corners of our state by treating people equally,” Donovan argued. “A criminal conviction can carry lifelong consequences affecting employment, student loans and education, and professional licensing and on this issue alone we should pass this bill.”


Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin also supports the decriminalization of marijuana, favoring the one ounce possession limit proposed by the Senate over the two ounces proposed by the House.


Steve McQueen, chief of the Winooski Police Department and president of the Vermont Association of Police Chiefs, and Essex County Sheriff Trevor Colby, president of the Vermont Sheriffs’ Association testified against decriminalizing marijuana.


Both officers testified that while marijuana users rarely see the inside of a jail cell, the decriminalization of marijuana would send the wrong message to the state’s youth.  McQueen added that the “hammer” of prosecution gives his officers the leverage they need to get offenders, often younger ones, on the “straight and narrow.”


There is strong public support for marijuana decriminalization in Vermont, according to a survey of voters conducted by Public Policy Polling last February. It found nearly two-thirds (63%) of voters support “a change in the law to provide for a fine of up to $ 150 without jail time for those who possess an ounce or less of marijuana for personal use.”





Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin WordPress | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

Intellihub.com

Vermont Police to Protest Marijuana Decriminalization at State House

BUDGET DAY, Weiner eyes comeback, McConnell: Our campaign was "bugged," Manchin-Toomey gun deal close, Immigration bill Thurs?, Kelly wins House seat, trivia



(swong@politico.com or @scottwongDC)


BUDGET DAY: OBAMA’S $ 3.77T BUDGET CALLS FOR TAXES ON RICH BUT ALSO ENTITLEMENT CUTS – President Obama’s 2014 fiscal blueprint was being delivered to Capitol Hill this morning, but the White House had already released some of the highlights. Reid J. Epstein writes for the hometown paper: “The budget itself represents some level of concession, White House aides say, arguing that Obama still would prefer a grand bargain that would completely rethink spending and revenue — though only one that comes on his terms. But even after weeks of outreach to Republicans following Obama’s beat-‘em-up campaign to stop the sequester cuts failed, that kind of deal still isn’t on the table. So they’re back to the budget duel: House Republicans want major cuts. Obama wants big revenues from the rich.


– “His $ 3.77 trillion proposal would reduce the deficit by $ 1.8 trillion by adding $ 580 billion in new taxes on the wealthy, according to senior administration officials. It also includes an estimated $ 230 billion in savings by reducing cost-of-living adjustments for federal entitlement programs. But all of those cuts — which White House aides say the president is ready to make — depend on whether Republicans agree to new tax revenues, including requiring people who make $ 1 million or more to pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes and limiting deductions for the top 2 percent of earners. ‘If they refuse to include revenues in any deal, then there will be no deal. It’s that simple,’ a senior administration official said in a briefing call with reporters Tuesday.” http://politi.co/ZMwXMt See an overview of Obama’s budget here: http://politi.co/YjbXlG


OBAMA’S BUDGET MUDDLE – Glenn Thrush and Byron Tau report for POLITICO: On Wednesday, Senate Republicans will break bread with President Barack Obama at the White House. On Tuesday, Bernie Sanders, the most liberal member of the Senate Democratic caucus, was standing outside the gates rebuking Obama for selling out seniors. That jarring juxtaposition captures the upside-down political dynamic of Obama’s new budget proposal, due to be released Wednesday: Its centerpiece is a highly controversial plan to trim Social Security cost-of-living increases — a move one longtime Obama adviser called a ‘goodwill gesture’ to Republicans and liberals decry as a shocking departure from Obama’s 2012 campaign rhetoric, a betrayal that warrants retribution. So far, there is scant evidence that Republicans view Obama’s ‘chained CPI’ proposal as a sign of good will. And there are plenty of people on the left who regard it as a sign of bad will—a departure from the message that won Obama a second-term and new occasion for doubting the president’s negotiating skills.” http://politi.co/ZMsp8P


– A dozen GOP senators are expected to dine with Obama tonight, including Sens. Johnny Isakson (Ga.), John Thune (S.D.) and Orrin Hatch (Utah.). Isakson will release the full list today but none are said to have attended last month’s dinner with senators at a nearby hotel.


– In an interview with POLITICO’s Jon Allen and Mike Allen, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer says Democrats aren’t ready to embrace Obama’s ‘chained CPI” plan. Watch video of the interview and read the story here: http://politi.co/12GInoR


WEINER EYES COMEBACK, MAYOR’S RACE – Maggie Haberman writes for POLITICO: “In a sweeping confessional interview published Wednesday, Anthony Weiner provided his first explanation of the bizarre behavior that led to his downfall, compared his wife’s circumstance to that of Hillary Clinton’s after the Monica Lewinsky scandal — and acknowledged he’s eagerly looking at a political comeback this year. The New York Times Magazine interview with Weiner and his wife, Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, has been the talk of New York’s political world for the past week. It is a building block of a political return by the former Queens congressman, who resigned after admitting that a lewd tweet sent from his account, which he’d claimed had been hacked, was in fact his own doing. The piece is the first time Weiner and Abedin have spoken at length about the rapid-fire events of 2011 that led him to resign his seat: the tweet he sent thinking it was a private message, the exposure by Andrew Breitbart’s site, the days of claiming he was the victim of a crime and then the ultimate, tearful confession at a Midtown press conference. http://politi.co/ZMtFss


– Jonathan Van Meter writes in the NYT Magazine piece: “At breakfast, Weiner quickly put all the speculation to rest: he is eyeing the mayor’s race. He told me that his political committee spent more than $ 100,000 on polling and research by Obama’s longtime pollster, David Binder (a detail that would be made public — and prompt a flurry of news reports — in mid-March when a spending report was filed with the city’s Campaign Finance Board). The focus of the poll, Binder says, was the question “Are voters willing to give him a second chance or not, regardless of what race or what contest?” And the answer? “There was this sense of ‘Yeah, he made a mistake. Let’s give him a second chance. But there are conditions on that, and there are a couple of things we’re going to want to know: What have you been doing since this incident occurred? Did you learn anything from this mistake? How did you deal with it?’ They want to know that they’ve put it behind them.” http://nyti.ms/10SLnMg


McCONNELL CLAIMS THE LEFT ‘BUGGED’ HIS CAMPAIGN HQ, ‘NIXONIAN’ TACTICS – Siobhan Hughes writes in the Wall Street Journal: “Sen. Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) on Tuesday accused ‘the political left in America’ of engaging in ‘Nixonian’ political tactics, reacting to the publication of an audio tape of a McConnell re-election strategy session. Mother Jones magazine published an article Tuesday based on the tape, in which campaign aides discussed how to attack potential rival Ashley Judd. Mr. McConnell told reporters:  ‘Last month, they were attacking my wife’s ethnicity’ — a reference to a tweet by a liberal group claiming wife Elaine Chao moved U.S. jobs to China– ‘and then apparently also unbeknownst to us they were bugging our headquarters – quite  a Nixonian move.’ He added:  ‘This is what you get from the political left in America.’ Ms. Chao, who was born in Taiwan, was labor secretary during the George W. Bush administration.


– “In a statement on its website, Mother Jones said: “As the story makes clear, we were recently provided the tape by a source who wished to remain anonymous. We were not involved in the making of the tape, but we published a story on the tape due to its obvious newsworthiness. It is our understanding that the tape was not the product of a Watergate-style bugging operation. We cannot comment beyond that.’ The tape of the McConnell strategy session begins with Mr. McConnell saying, ‘I assume most of you have played the, the game Whac-A-Mole? This is the Whac-A-Mole period of the campaign,’ to try to identify and attack potential contenders, according to the transcript posted by Mother Jones.” http://on.wsj.com/10SFQVZ


– Mother Jones’ David Korn, who broke the story, writes that the McConnell campaign discusses raising Judd’s past history with mental illness: “[T]he McConnell gang explored going far beyond Judd’s politics and policy preferences. This included her mental health. The meeting leader noted: ‘She’s clearly, this sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced. I mean it’s been documented. Jesse can go in chapter and verse from her autobiography about, you know, she’s suffered some suicidal tendencies. She was hospitalized for 42 days when she had a mental breakdown in the ’90s.’” http://bit.ly/YjkHZ0


– At the request of the McConnell campaign, the FBI is looking into the matter, POLITICO’s Lois Romano and Kevin Robillard reports: http://politi.co/10OSxmn


MANCHIN, TOOMEY SAY THEY’RE CLOSE TO GUN DEAL – John Bresnahan and Reid Epstein reports for POLITICO: “Sen. Joe Manchin says he is on the verge of a bipartisan deal to expand background checks for gun sales, an agreement that could lead to the biggest change in U.S. gun laws in nearly 20 years. Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, has been meeting with conservative GOP Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania over the past week to try to forge a deal on background checks. Following a briefing with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Manchin told reporters the two sides were very close to an agreement. … Signaling that they had reached consensus, Manchin and Toomey announced Tuesday night they would be holding a joint press conference on expanded background checks on Wednesday at 11 a.m. …


– “Reid moved Tuesday night to start debate over a gun control package that is a wish list for gun control advocates. Reid filed a cloture motion that sets up a Thursday vote to end a GOP filibuster of the motion to proceed to that gun bill. In order to gather 60 votes, Reid and other senior Democrats believe they can hold on to their own nervous members from red states, while picking up 10 or so Republicans.” http://politi.co/Z6339T


–The WSJ editorial board’s lead op-ed says Ted Cruz and his fellow Republicans have “misfired” in filibustering the gun bill: “The President’s calculation seems to be that even if gun control fails, at least he’ll have a keep-kids-safe political issue to help flip the House back to Democratic control in the next midterm. In that sense his inflammatory rhetoric is meant to bait Republicans, some of whom are biting.  If conservatives want to prove their gun-control bona fides, the way to do it is to debate the merits and vote on the floor. They can always filibuster the final bill if they want to, but it makes no sense to paint themselves into a political box canyon before even knowing what they’re voting on.” http://on.wsj.com/ZEB3gP


‘GANG OF EIGHT’ IMMIGRATION BILL COULD COME THURSDAY – Mike Allen reports for POLITICO: “The Senate’s immigration Gang of Eight plans to announce a deal within a week but a committee markup is not expected until at least the week of May 6, providing a long period for debate and changes, Senate aides said Tuesday. Aides said the legislative proposal could be released as soon as Thursday, but is more likely to be ready early next week. The schedule outlined by the aides is meant to satisfy Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has said repeatedly that he wants a full debate and amendment process, to maximize the chances that the final vote is an overwhelming majority.” http://politi.co/ZgUwOD


Wall Street Journal, A1, “Senate Plan Sets High Bar On Border Security,” By Sara Murray: “Immigrants in the U.S. illegally would not gain green cards under a bipartisan Senate bill until law-enforcement officials are monitoring the entire southern border and stopping 90% of people crossing illegally in certain areas, according to people familiar with the plan. The border-security proposal, part of a broader immigration bill being written by eight senators, sets several goals that would have to be met before any of the estimated 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally could apply for permanent legal residency, also known as a green card, according to the people familiar with the Senate talks. Meeting all the goals is expected to take 10 years.


– “In a major change for businesses, all employers would be required after a five-year phase-in period to use the government’s E-Verify system, which screens for illegal workers. E-Verify now is largely voluntary, though some states require it. Some 409,000 employers had enrolled in the program as of last year, the federal government says, a tiny fraction of the estimated six million private U.S. employers, many of which have only a handful of employees.” http://on.wsj.com/ZMDhDz


– A House immigration bill is hung up on a disagreement over low-skilled workers, Jake Sherman and Kate Nocera report for POLITICO: http://politi.co/17pUsCE


IMMIGRATION POLITICS IS LOCAL – Manu Raju and Anna Palmer report for POLITICO: “Sen. Barbara Mikulski wants to help the Polish. Sen. Chuck Schumer wants to help the Irish. Sen. Marco Rubio wants to woo foreign workers to help after national emergencies. And Sen. Mazie Hirono wants to reunite Filipino World War II veterans with their families. As negotiations over a sweeping immigration deal comes to a head, senators are rapidly moving to resolve a bevy of narrow and parochial issues raised by lawmakers nervous about the impact of the far-reaching plan.


– “On Tuesday, one issue affecting rural America appeared closer to resolution: A new visa program for foreign workers on farms. A deal between labor and farm industry officials over wages for workers and caps on annual visas for migrant workers could come as soon as Wednesday, helping attract a range of rural-state lawmakers eager to appease farm interests back home. And Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said he was close to resolving a lingering dispute with Rubio, the Florida Republican, over the number of H1-B visas to provide high-skill foreign workers.” http://politi.co/152xVwj


** On the Hill? Then join the Susan G. Komen Global Race for the Cure ‘State of Pink’ Challenge, a little friendly competition to support the fight against breast cancer. Just form a team in your office and then come celebrate with us on Saturday, May 11. Winning teams will be recognized on Race Day. Learn more. http://globalrace.info-komen.org/site/PageServer?pagename=hq_gr_2012_about_hill_teams   


GOOD WEDNESDAY MORNING, APRIL 10, 2013, and welcome to The Huddle, your play-by-play preview of the day’s congressional news. Send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to swong@politico.com. If you don’t already, please follow me on Twitter @scottwongDC.


My new followers include @cshogan276 and @MatosJay.


TODAY IN CONGRESS – The Senate is in at 9:30 a.m. resume consideration of a cloture motion on gun control legislation known as the Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013. Unless the Senate comes to an agreement, the Senate will hold a cloture vote on the motion to proceed on Thursday.


The House is in at 10 a.m. with first votes expected between 1:30 and 2 p.m. and last votes expected between 5 and 6 p.m. on the Bureau of Reclamation Small Conduit Hydropower Development and Rural Jobs Act.


AROUND THE HILL – President Barack Obama’s fiscal year 2014 budget is delivered to Congress at 8 a.m. in Cannon 210 and at 8:15 a.m. in Dirksen 604. Sen. Ted Cruz speaks on guns at 9:30 a.m. in S-325. Speaker John Boehner and other GOP leaders hold a post-conference media availability at 10 a.m. in HC-8. Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer holds a pen and pad briefing at 10:30 a.m. in H-144.


Reps. Chris Smith and Frank Wolf speak on Vietnamese victims on religious persecution in Vietnam at 10:30 a.m. at the House Triangle. Sens. Pat Toomey and Joe Manchin will speak on firearms background checks at 11 a.m. in S-325.


A news conference where Sens. Jerry Moran, Dick Blumenthal, Jim Inhofe, Amy Klobuchar, Kelly Ayotte and David Vitter planned to reintroduce legislation to stop air traffic control tower closings has been postponed due to a scheduling conflict.


Reps. Marcia Fudge and Chaka Fattah, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and others speak on the State of Black America at 11:30 a.m. at the House Triangle. Rep. Joe Crowley speaks on comprehensive immigration reform at 12:30 p.m. at the House Triangle. Steny Hoyer and House Democrats speak on Make It In America legislation at 1 p.m. in HVC Studio A. Rep. Frank Wolf speaks on Benghazi at 1:30 p.m. at the House Triangle.


The Small Business Committees hold a small business summit from 1 to 5:30 p.m. in Russell 428A. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and Senate Budget Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions hold a conference call tomorrow in response to President Obama’s fiscal year 2014 budget proposal, at 2 p.m. Call in: (888) 469-1370. Passcode: 224143. House Triangle. Rep. Bob Goodlatte speaks on RFS legislation at 2:30 p.m. at the House Triangle. Chairwoman Patty Murray’s Senate Budget Committee holds a hearing on President Obama’s budget at 3 p.m. in Dirksen 608. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and ranking member Dutch Ruppersberger hold post-CISPA mark-up availability at 4 p.m. at the HVC Intel stakeout site.


‘OBAMA PHONES’ DRAW SCRUTINY ON CAPITOL HILL – Karen Tumulty writes on A1 of thwe Washington Post: “Obama phone” is the widely used — and misleading — nickname of a 28-year-old federal program known as Lifeline. It provides discounts, averaging $ 9.25 a month, on phone service for 13.3 million low-income subscribers. In the 31 / 2 years after false rumors started that the Obama administration was giving free cellphones to poor people — and six months after a racially charged video about it went viral — a once-obscure phone service subsidy is getting renewed scrutiny on Capitol Hill. There are growing calls in Congress to end or drastically cut back Lifeline; later this month, the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing that could help determine its fate.  … Lifeline was begun not by President Obama but under Ronald Reagan. It expanded to include cellphone service during the presidency of another Republican, George W. Bush.” http://wapo.st/ZMCXoD


KELLY EASILY WINS JACKSON JR.S OLD HOUSE SEAT – Rick Pearson and Bill Ruthhart write on A1 of the Chicago Tribune: “Following Tuesday’s special election victory, Democrat Robin Kelly will start a new job in Congress as the least senior member of a House dominated by Republicans. That political reality is not lost on Kelly, who said her first task is to restore district offices and concentrate on constituent services as she replaces disgraced former Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. in the South Side and south suburban 2nd Congressional District. … Kelly, who launched her campaign on a strong gun-control theme, was joined at her victory party by Nathaniel Pendleton and Cleopatra Cowley-Pendleton, the parents of Hadiya Pendleton, a 15-year-old band majorette killed by gunfire on the South Side little more than a week after performing in Washington during President Barack Obama’s inauguration weekend festivities. ‘Watch us take on the NRA, the tea party and anyone else standing in the way of safety,’ Kelly said. With 80 percent of precincts counted in the low-turnout contest, Kelly had 74 percent of the vote to about 19 percent for Republican Paul McKinley, an unemployed political activist and ex-convict.” http://trib.in/10TPk5P


OBAMA’S NOMINEES COAST THROUGH SENATE HEARINGS – Matthew L. Wald and Robert Pear write for the New York Times: “President Obama’s three nominees to run Medicare and Medicaid, the Energy Department and the Office of Management and Budget sailed through their separate Senate confirmation hearings on Tuesday and appeared to be on track to win approval from the committees, though none of the panels voted on the nominations. Marilyn B. Tavenner, who has been chosen to run the government’s big health care programs, won endorsement from the House Republican leader, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, who said he had worked with her in his days as a state lawmaker. …


– “Similarly, Mr. Obama’s nominee for energy secretary, Ernest J. Moniz, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was under secretary of energy in the Clinton administration, faced no opposition Tuesday in a three-hour hearing held by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, who has been nominated as director of the budget office, also appeared to have no serious opposition in the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.” http://nyti.ms/12J1xug


TUESDAY’S TRIVIA WINNER – Adam Heider was first to correctly answer that Ted Yoho (Florida), David Price (UNC) and Joe Courtney (UConn) are the current House members who represent the districts that include the three universities that are tied for the most number of Division I NCAA basketball championships in the last 10 years. Each won two titles in the past decade.


CORRECTION: Monday’s trivia answer should have said Tom McMillen was elected to Congress in 1986, the same year he retired from the NBA.


TODAY’S TRIVIA – Claude Marx has today’s question: Which president signed legislation creating the Labor Department? First to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at swong@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


** On the Hill? Then join the Susan G. Komen Global Race for the Cure ‘State of Pink’ Challenge, a little friendly competition to support the fight against breast cancer. Since 1990, Komen’s investments have helped drive down breast cancer mortality rates in the U.S. by 33% thanks to participants like you. Represent your state and keep the momentum going. Form a team in your office today and then come celebrate with us on Saturday, May 11. The largest congressional team and top fundraising team will be recognized on Race Day. Learn more. http://globalrace.info-komen.org/site/PageServer?pagename=hq_gr_2012_about_hill_teams




POLITICO – Top 10 – The Huddle



BUDGET DAY, Weiner eyes comeback, McConnell: Our campaign was "bugged," Manchin-Toomey gun deal close, Immigration bill Thurs?, Kelly wins House seat, trivia

Monday, April 8, 2013

Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)




Jesse Ventura – Conspiracy Theory S03E04 – The Ozarks Ventura looks into rumors that the elite are building fortified retreats and underground bunkers in rem…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Jeremy Rys (AlienScientist) talks with David Hilton about the status of his YouTube channel which was shut down for a month by a disinfo troll named Thomas L…
Video Rating: 0 / 5



Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)

Sunday, April 7, 2013

White House Attacks Prison Planet.com Report On Blackouts - Alex Jones Tv Sunday Edition 2/5




Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson http://www.infowars.com/ http://www.prisonplanet.tv/ February 5, 2011 – Lies about Texas not being affected by draconian EPA …



White House Attacks Prison Planet.com Report On Blackouts - Alex Jones Tv Sunday Edition 2/5

Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)




Jesse Ventura – Conspiracy Theory S03E04 – The Ozarks Ventura looks into rumors that the elite are building fortified retreats and underground bunkers in rem…




http://www.JoshTolley.com Investigator, Doug Hagmann (from Hagmann and Hagmann) exposes that the top conspiracy theories are not theories after all! The Midd…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)

Friday, April 5, 2013

Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)




Jesse Ventura – Conspiracy Theory S03E04 – The Ozarks Ventura looks into rumors that the elite are building fortified retreats and underground bunkers in rem…



Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)

The Showdown Over Gun Votes in the House



In January, with the horror of the Newtown massacre still fresh, House Democrats assembled a task force to begin discussing gun controls. With negotiations now about to culminate in the Senate, the task force is focused on a bipartisan effort to assure a vote on that potential legislation in the House, according to Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), who is playing a key role behind the scenes.


McCarthy, who came to Congress in 1997 on a campaign to reduce gun violence after her husband was murdered and her son severely injured in the Long Island Rail Road massacre of 1993, serves as vice chair of the task force. Given the steep political climb for any new gun control measures (with expanded background checks perhaps being the most possible, though still far from certain), McCarthy is remaining tightlipped about who might be cooperating on the Republican side. “We’re not releasing any names,” she said, declining to comment even on the number of Republicans involved.


McCarthy did reveal in an interview that the task force is focused on persuading 27 Democrats in the House who typically would not vote for gun reforms. Among those, she said that there may be seven of them “who truly would be in [electoral] trouble” if they backed the bill. (The House currently has 232 Republicans, 200 Democrats, and three vacant seats.) It’s a struggle in which she has been facing an all-too-familiar response from some of her colleagues, she said: “‘Carolyn, I’d love to vote for you,’ they say, but they’re waiting to see what comes up [in the Senate].”


Continue Reading »


Politics | Mother Jones



The Showdown Over Gun Votes in the House

Thursday, April 4, 2013

What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)



The White House and prominent Democrats are talking about reducing future Social Security payments by using a formula for adjusting for inflation that’s stingier than the current one. It’scalled the “Chained CPI.” I did this video so you can understand it — and understand why it’s so wrongheaded.


Even Social Security’s current inflation adjustment understates the true impact of inflation on the elderly. That’s because they spend 20 to 40 percent of their incomes on health care, and health-care costs have been rising faster than inflation. So why adopt a new inflation adjustment that’s even stingier than the current one?


Social Security benefits are already meager for most recipients. The median income of Americans over 65 is less than $ 20,000 a year. Nearly 70 percent of them depend on Social Security for more than half of this. The average Social Security benefit is less than $ 15,000 a year.


Besides, Social Security isn’t in serious trouble. The Social Security trust fund is flush for at least two decades. If we want to ensure it’s there beyond that, there’s an easy fix — just lift the ceiling on income subject to Social Security taxes, which is now $ 113,700.


Why are Democrats even suggesting the inflation adjustment be reduced? Republicans aren’t asking for it. Not even Paul Ryan’s draconian budget includes it.


Democrats invented Social Security and have been protecting it for almost 80 years. They shouldn’t be leading the charge against it.



ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock” and “The Work of Nations.” His latest is an e-book, “Beyond Outrage,” now available in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.


Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich




Robert Reich



What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)

What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)



The White House and prominent Democrats are talking about reducing future Social Security payments by using a formula for adjusting for inflation that’s stingier than the current one. It’scalled the “Chained CPI.” I did this video so you can understand it — and understand why it’s so wrongheaded.


Even Social Security’s current inflation adjustment understates the true impact of inflation on the elderly. That’s because they spend 20 to 40 percent of their incomes on health care, and health-care costs have been rising faster than inflation. So why adopt a new inflation adjustment that’s even stingier than the current one?


Social Security benefits are already meager for most recipients. The median income of Americans over 65 is less than $ 20,000 a year. Nearly 70 percent of them depend on Social Security for more than half of this. The average Social Security benefit is less than $ 15,000 a year.


Besides, Social Security isn’t in serious trouble. The Social Security trust fund is flush for at least two decades. If we want to ensure it’s there beyond that, there’s an easy fix — just lift the ceiling on income subject to Social Security taxes, which is now $ 113,700.


Why are Democrats even suggesting the inflation adjustment be reduced? Republicans aren’t asking for it. Not even Paul Ryan’s draconian budget includes it.


Democrats invented Social Security and have been protecting it for almost 80 years. They shouldn’t be leading the charge against it.



ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock” and “The Work of Nations.” His latest is an e-book, “Beyond Outrage,” now available in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.


Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich




Robert Reich



What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)

What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)



The White House and prominent Democrats are talking about reducing future Social Security payments by using a formula for adjusting for inflation that’s stingier than the current one. It’scalled the “Chained CPI.” I did this video so you can understand it — and understand why it’s so wrongheaded.


Even Social Security’s current inflation adjustment understates the true impact of inflation on the elderly. That’s because they spend 20 to 40 percent of their incomes on health care, and health-care costs have been rising faster than inflation. So why adopt a new inflation adjustment that’s even stingier than the current one?


Social Security benefits are already meager for most recipients. The median income of Americans over 65 is less than $ 20,000 a year. Nearly 70 percent of them depend on Social Security for more than half of this. The average Social Security benefit is less than $ 15,000 a year.


Besides, Social Security isn’t in serious trouble. The Social Security trust fund is flush for at least two decades. If we want to ensure it’s there beyond that, there’s an easy fix — just lift the ceiling on income subject to Social Security taxes, which is now $ 113,700.


Why are Democrats even suggesting the inflation adjustment be reduced? Republicans aren’t asking for it. Not even Paul Ryan’s draconian budget includes it.


Democrats invented Social Security and have been protecting it for almost 80 years. They shouldn’t be leading the charge against it.



ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock” and “The Work of Nations.” His latest is an e-book, “Beyond Outrage,” now available in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.


Follow Robert Reich on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RBReich




Robert Reich



What"s the "Chained CPI," Why It"s Bad for Social Security and Why the White House Shouldn"t Be Touting It (VIDEO)

Monday, April 1, 2013

Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)




Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)

Jesse Ventura – Conspiracy Theory S03E04 – The Ozarks Ventura looks into rumors that the elite are building fortified retreats and underground bunkers in rem…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




BUY DVD OR DOWNLOAD AT http://www.worldbfreefilms.com/ TAKE A WILD CINEMATIC ROLLER COASTER RIDE WITH ME AS I BRING TO YOU A RAW AND UNCUT IN YOUR FACE SHOCK…
Video Rating: 2 / 5



Conspiracy Theory - Ozarks, Huff house, underground city (magyar felirat)

Friday, March 29, 2013

Investigators Discover NRA Materials in Newtown Killer"s House



Shortly after the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, police investigators seized a large arsenal of weapons from the killer’s home, according to search warrants made public on Thursday. That the home of Adam Lanza and his mother, Nancy, contained an array of powerful handguns and rifles is no surprise, but the documents reveal an even darker picture than previously known to the public: Investigators also found a cache of knives, samurai swords, 1,600 rounds of ammunition, a military uniform, and news clippings about prior mass murders in the United States and abroad.


They also discovered materials from the National Rifle Association.



In addition to the stockpile of weaponry, the home contained a certificate from the NRA bearing Adam Lanza’s name, a NRA guide to shooting, and training manuals for various firearms, including the Bushmaster that Lanza used to carry out the slaughter. The CEO of the company that sells Bushmaster rifles sits on a powerful committee inside the NRA, as we first reported in January.


For the NRA, which has been highly effective with its messaging in the gun debate over the years, the news is a blow. The new details begin to disarm the gun group’s strategy to divert attention from the highly lethal weapons Lanza used by focusing on him as just another deranged criminal with no connection to “good guys with guns.” In his audacious speech a week after the Newtown massacre, NRA spokesman Wayne LaPierre talked of “genuine monsters” lurking across America, of “people so deranged, so evil, so possessed by voices and driven by demons that no sane person can possibly ever comprehend them.” He continued: “They walk among us every day. And does anybody really believe that the next Adam Lanza isn’t planning his attack on a school he’s already identified at this very moment?”


Now we know that “next Adam Lanza” may well have NRA certification and know-how at his fingertips.


The NRA’s response on Thursday seemed telling: flat-out denial, with some defensive kick to it. “There is no record of a member relationship between Newtown killer Adam Lanza, nor between Nancy Lanza, A. Lanza or N. Lanza with the National Rifle Association,” it said in a statement. “Reporting to the contrary is reckless, false and defamatory.”


Since the NRA makes virtually no information available to the public about its inner workings or the membership it claims, naturally we’ll have to take the group’s word against that of Connecticut law enforcement officials and the FBI. (And if that seems reasonable, the NRA also has a fantasy about “gun-free zones” they’d like to sell you on.)


Details in the newly released documents also underscore why Lanza was capable of such terrible carnage on December 14 at Sandy Hook Elementary. The military-style assault rifle and 30-round magazines he used—defended by the NRA as tools of hunting and sport—allowed him to unleash 154 bullets in less than five minutes. These were the same type of powerful weapons used in numerous other mass shootings, which the White House and some Democrats in Congress now seek to outlaw.


The news came on a day when President Obama appeared at the White House with Newtown families and other mass-shooting victims to once again demand action from Congress. (Though the president’s focus is now on passing universal background checks, with political prospects dimmer for legislation banning assault weapons or high-capacity magazines.) The anguish is still fresh in Newtown and well beyond, the president said, pushing back on the notion that the emotional impact of the tragedy has started to fade:


It’s been barely a hundred days since 20 innocent children and six brave educators were taken from us by gun violence, including Grace McDonnell and Lauren Russo and Jesse Lewis, whose families are here today. That agony burns deep in the families of thousands, thousands of Americans stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun over these last 100 days, including Hadiya Pendleton, who was killed on her way to school less than two months ago, and whose mom is also here today, everything they lived for and hoped for taken away in an instant.



The president didn’t mention the NRA or its allies, but he took direct aim at their argument against universal background checks, a policy he noted has extraordinary public support, with 90 percent of Americans—including an overwhelming majority of gun owners—behind it. “What we’re proposing is not radical, it’s not taking away anybody’s gun rights,” he said. “It’s something that, if we are serious, we will do it. Now is the time to turn that heartbreak into something real.”


Watch his full remarks, followed by the long list of weapons found in Lanza’s home, below the video clip:



Here are highlights from the search warrants showing the stockpile of weapons found in the Lanza home:


 

 

 

 

See the full documents here.



Politics | Mother Jones



Investigators Discover NRA Materials in Newtown Killer"s House